Home Print this page Email this page Users Online: 536
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
EDITORIAL
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 189

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy


Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Dammam, Dammam, kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Date of Web Publication3-Aug-2015

Correspondence Address:
Abdulaziz A Al-Quorain
P. O. Box 40001, Al-Khobar 31952
kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

DOI: 10.4103/1658-631X.161991

Rights and Permissions
How to cite this article:
Al-Quorain AA. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Saudi J Med Med Sci 2015;3:189

How to cite this URL:
Al-Quorain AA. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Saudi J Med Med Sci [serial online] 2015 [cited 2022 Jan 26];3:189. Available from: https://www.sjmms.net/text.asp?2015/3/3/189/161991

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was introduced to the clinical practice in 1980 in Munich, Germany. Since that time, it has changed the management of kidneys and upper gastrointestinal stones dramatically. [1],[2]

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is a noninvasive procedure for the treatment of kidney stones, as well as gallbladder, common bile duct, and pancreatic duct stones. [3],[4] However, regarding kidney stones other invasive procedures such as percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are more superior. [5] The management of renal stones can be classified into conservative management, ESWL, PCNL, RIRS, and endoscopic techniques. The American Urological Association's Stone Guideline Panel has classified ESWL as a potential first-line treatment for ureteral and renal stones smaller than 2 cm. [6] ESWL is considered as least invasive and a relatively safe procedure for treatment of kidney stones. However, it is accompanied by some side-effects and complications, requiring measures such as analgesics and sedatives to prevent them. [7]

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy may be associated with morbidity due to the fragmented products, which can lead to lesions in the kidneys and the adjacent organs. There are absolute contraindications to ESWL, namely; acute urinary tract infections or urosepsis; coagulopathies, pregnancy, and obstruction distal to the stones. [8]

The overall complication rate of ESWL ranges from 5% to 20%. However, it is an efficient and noninvasive procedure for the management of kidney, gallbladder, common bile duct, and pancreatic duct stones. Hence, "ESWL delivered in an outpatient setting as an anesthesia-free treatment is still considered the first option for the majority of stones with a minimal number of complications. Treatment optimization by limiting renal damage and better selection of patients will offer maximum benefit to patients and physicians, besides being cost-effective treatment." [9]

In this issue, Dr. Darawany reviews ESWL and other modalities and their roles in the management of kidney stones.

 
  References Top

1.
Chaussy C, Brendel W, Schmiedt E. Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. Lancet 1980;2: 1265-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Chaussy C, Schmiedt E, Jocham D, Brendel W, Forssmann B, Walther V. First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol 1982;127: 417-20.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Tandan M, Reddy DN. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic and large common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:4365-71.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Inui K, Tazuma S, Yamaguchi T, Ohara H, Tsuji T, Miyagawa H, et al. Treatment of pancreatic stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: Results of a multicenter survey. Pancreas 2005;30: 26-30.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Liou LS, Streem SB. Long-term renal functional effects of shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and combination therapy: A comparative study of patients with solitary kidney. J Urol 2001;166:36.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Lindqvist K, Holmberg G, Peeker R, Grenabo L. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy as primary treatment for ureteric stones: A retrospective study comparing two different treatment strategies. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2006;40:113-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Mezentsev VA. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs vs. opioids for SWL using modern electromagnetic lithotripters. Int Braz J Urol 2009;35:293-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A. Guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Assoc Urol 2010. p. 6-106.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Argyropoulos AN, Tolley DA. Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy in the 21 st century. Eur Urol 2007;52:344-52.  Back to cited text no. 9
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2185    
    Printed51    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded3838    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]